雅思写作大作文题目讲解

简单分析：这是一篇论述类的题目，烤鸭们要分别论证经过科技改良食物的优点和缺点，并且表明自己的立场。这个题目有一点的难度，因为科技是比较小众的雅思话题，也提醒各位烤鸭要注意复习的全面性，不能有侥幸的心理。

雅思写作大作文参考范文

Technology, the mighty force which is created by the comparatively smaller, walnut-shaped human brain, has changed the landscape, redefined the natural resources and even diversified the food we human beings rely on. The opponents and the proponents both hold their own justifications and I deem that there is no black-or-white conclusion of this issue.

It is more likely that food shortage will undermine the wellbeing of masses less frequently if technology and scientific breakthrough improve the quality and range of choices. In the past when we human beings relied heavily on the rather limited sources of food, a spell of abnormal weather can pose a threat to the yield of the crops and the health condition of livestock, let alone the unpredicted climate change. However, the miserable past is no longer the case today. People are less prone to the impact of scarcity of the food supply and the quality as more food sources can be utilized with the advancement of science.

On the other hand, the skeptics think technology a two-edged sword and the potential risks of technologically-modified food can never be underestimated. The security of some food generated by technology has not been identified, thereby entailing some unpredictable consequences. The genetically modified food, a milestone in human history, provides more options of food and enhance the quality on the one hand, also induces the doubts on its potential harm to human body and health.

Personally, I suppose a reconciliation should be achieved between this two statements. What really matters on this issue is how properly the technologically- changed food can function in the society and what the following steps we shall take if some dire consequences arise. After all , it is the tiny brain that has the final say instead of the technology it creates.

就我个人而言，我认为这两种说法之间应该达成和解。在这个问题上真正重要的是，技术改变的食物在社会中如何发挥作用，如果出现一些可怕的后果，我们将采取以下步骤。毕竟，它是一个微小的大脑，拥有最终的发言权，而不是它创造的技术。